ORIGINAL PATENT: 2004
vs
STOLEN VERSION: 2011
STATUS: Legitimately Filed
INVENTOR: Hispanic American
PRIORITY: FIRST TO INVENT
EVIDENCE: Complete Documentation
Original inventor continues developing and refining the technology, building prototypes and seeking commercial partnerships while maintaining full patent rights and documentation.
STATUS: FRAUDULENT FILING
COMPANY: VidStream (Patent Troll)
CRIME: INTELLECTUAL THEFT
EVIDENCE: 7-Year Gap Proves Theft
VidStream launches aggressive patent trolling campaign using STOLEN intellectual property, generating over $105 million in fraudulent settlements while the original inventor is systematically denied justice through judicial corruption.
Amount received by original 2004 patent holder
Fraudulent settlements using stolen 2011 patent
Amount that must be returned to rightful inventor
Hear directly from the original 2004 patent holder as he exposes how VidStream systematically stole his intellectual property and built a $105 million patent trolling empire on the foundation of his stolen invention.
Revolutionary video streaming architecture with adaptive bitrate algorithms
Complete technical specifications, prototypes, and development history
IDENTICAL video streaming architecture with COPIED adaptive bitrate algorithms
7-year gap proves impossibility of independent invention - clear theft
The technical similarities between the 2004 original and 2011 "patent" are not coincidental. The 7-year gap makes independent invention statistically impossible.
Real inventors must be protected from corporate patent theft and fraud.
VidStream executives must face criminal charges for intellectual property theft.
The $105+ million must be immediately returned to the rightful patent owner.
This theft represents an attack on the foundation of American innovation and patent law.
DEMAND JUSTICE FOR THE 2004 PATENT HOLDER