DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF PRIORITY
Visual documentation of Gabriel DeLaVega's patent priority and rightful ownership
DOCUMENTED PROOF: 2004 PATENT PRIORITY vs 2012 INFRINGEMENT
Complete documentation of patent priority and rightful ownership of streaming video technology
Gabriel DeLaVega filed his streaming video patent 8+ years before VidStream's competing patent
Gabriel DeLaVega establishes priority date for streaming video technology on August 8, 2003.
LEGAL FOUNDATION: Priority date gives DeLaVega first-to-invent rights
Gabriel DeLaVega files US Patent 10,205,986 B2 on August 4, 2004, covering "Streaming Video Selection System and Method."
PATENT PROTECTION: Comprehensive coverage of streaming video technology
DeLaVega continues developing and refining his patented streaming video technology. Industry begins adopting similar methods.
INNOVATION PERIOD: Foundation technology for modern streaming platforms
VidStream files US Patent 8,464,304 on May 9, 2012 - 8+ YEARS AFTER DELAVEGA'S PATENT.
PATENT INFRINGEMENT: VidStream's patent covers identical technology
Youtoo Technologies (later VidStream) files lawsuit against Twitter using STOLEN PATENT TECHNOLOGY originally invented by DeLaVega.
FRAUD BEGINS: Suing others with illegally obtained patents
Youtoo Technologies declares bankruptcy. VidStream LLC acquires the stolen patents and continues lawsuit against Twitter.
CONSPIRACY CONTINUES: Patent troll entity takes over stolen IP
Twitter challenges VidStream's patents at Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Federal Circuit upholds invalid patents, ignoring DeLaVega's prior art.
JUSTICE FAILURE: Courts fail to identify DeLaVega's prior art
Dallas jury awards VidStream $105 MILLION on April 16, 2025, using patents that infringe on DeLaVega's 2004 technology.
MASSIVE THEFT: $105 million stolen using DeLaVega's patented technology
Complete evidence of DeLaVega's 8-year patent priority exposed. Legal action required to reclaim stolen $105 million settlement.
LEGAL REMEDY: VidStream's patents must be invalidated, settlement returned
VidStream's 2012 patent directly copies and infringes on DeLaVega's 2004 foundational work
Visual documentation of Gabriel DeLaVega's patent priority and rightful ownership
DeLaVega's 2004 prior art invalidates VidStream's 2012 patents
$105 million must be returned to rightful patent owner
$105 million plus damages rightfully belongs to DeLaVega
8+ years of documented patent priority cannot be ignored
DELAVEGA IS THE RIGHTFUL OWNER OF STREAMING VIDEO TECHNOLOGY